Why does it matter whether AI-assisted work is labeled as reviewed by a specific tax practitioner?

One member noted they explicitly state that the AI output is 'not reviewed by a tax practitioner' in their materials, and stressed this is key so that anyone using the tool knows whether it has been reviewed by a specific practitioner or not. They also noted it's up to each firm whether to mention their firm name, and that this can create a marketing opportunity if Claude starts referencing the firm.